A recent reference book on medical genetics lists over 4,500 diseases caused by genetic mutations. Mutations are permanent random changes in cellular DNA. They change the genetic code for amino acid sequence in proteins. It is understood that the fire that occurred in the Apollo capsule that killed three astronauts was the result of a comma in the wrong place for instruction for creating the space capsule. One amino acid out of sequence as a result of base sequence error in the DNA creates similar results in the biochemical world. These wrong DNA instructions are the result of deletion or insertions of a DNA base, the alphabet of DNA. When this takes place in the female ova or male sperm DNA, the genetic mutation becomes permanent and is what is known as inherited diseases. Mutations also take place in cells in the body and accumulate over time but are not passed on. These are known as "somatic mutations." Cancers and other degenerative diseases are the result of this kind of mutation.

Geneticist Dr. Ling Lester explains that a mutation is basically just a genetic mistake.³⁵⁶ Genes are passed on from generation to generation. To be passed on they are copied. Like in any other copying process, the copying of genes can result in mistakes. These mistakes we call mutations. Dr. Carl Weeland explains that in everyone of us is information, an information code, which determines that we are going to be a human being verses an alligator, that you will have blue eyes verses green eyes. Half of this information comes from our mother and half from our dads. DNA from our parents is two six foot long strands. This DNA is cut up into 23 pieces we call chromosomes. Genes are little sentences along these DNA chromosome strands. The information in these genes, which determines for example whether you will have green or blue eyes, is not passed on like a copier, but is copied one letter at a time. The total information in the DNA in ourselves and all the coded letters would fill volumes and volumes of books. In twenty minutes, all the information, all the letters and sentences which determines what we are going to be, is copied from the 23 chromosomes in our cells for reproduction. Every once in a while a typo occurs in this process which results in a mutation of that gene. Amazingly our bodies have filtering mechanisms which filter out many of these mistakes. Sometimes, however, despite this, a mistake gets by. If this happens in the sperm of the male or egg of the female it is passed on permanently from generation to generation and these mutations build up from generation to generation. Like in a computer program, if you have a defect in the program and copy it, you copy the defect with it.³⁵⁶

If this is true, why don’t we see this accumulation of defects in ourselves more greatly than we do? The reason is because it will only show up if both parents have this same defect in the same gene. If one does not, the good gene is produced rather than the defective one.

Biologist Dr. Gary Parker explains that evolutionists want us to believe that mutations are the writers who are writing new information into the script that give us new traits and new abilities. Science shows us just the opposite.³⁵⁶ Darwin and his associates believed that if an animal through successive generations did not use a particular genetic expression, that this would result in a change in the genetic script and would be passed on to the offspring. We know now though through science that this is not the case, that whether genes are used or not, they are still passed on from one generation to another. In light of these facts, despite the fact this has never been demonstrated through scientific observation, evolutionists now teach that change in organisms come about through mutations in the existing genetic code.

Unfortunately, what evolutionists don’t tell you is that all mutations are harmful, not beneficial. Mutations cause problems rather than the means for evolutionary change. We here a lot about cholesterol today. Two much in our blood streams results in the clotting of our arteries. Recently it has been discovered that this is caused by a biochemical defect called familial hypercholesteroleniia (FH). This disorder is the result of a mutation of a gene which creates a protein imbedded in the cell membrane which allows fats and cholesterol created in the liver to pass through into the cell. In some cases little or none of this protein is produced or if it is produced is not imbedded into the cell membrane. In other cases the protein is imbedded in the cell membrane but does not link with the fat or cholesterol packages. In another case it is not allowed to stay imbedded in the cell membrane. In another case the protein links with the fat and cholesterol packages but does not allow them to pass through into the cell.

Cholesterol in our systems is not bad because it is used in the construction of cell membranes. When the cell needs cholesterol it sends a message to the liver and the liver produces cholesterol in the blood stream for the cell to use. When the cell is not able to pass the cholesterol through its cell membrane, it keeps sending more messages to the liver to produce more cholesterol because it doesn’t know the problem is not being able to pass the available cholesterol through. This results in high levels of cholesterol in the blood stream. The end result is rapid atherosclerosis and heart disease. If a child has inherited this problem it results in fatal heart disease in their youth.

Another example of a mutated disease is cystic fibrosis (CF). This is another disease which cripples children and leads to early death. It results in damage to the lungs, digestive organs and in males the spermatic duct. It is the result of the mispelling of one key gene which regulates chloride ion transport across the cell membrane. The production of this protein involves 250,000 base pairs in the mRNA and 1,480 amino acids in the production of the protein. Research has shown this defect is the result of a deletion of three nucleotides (3 bases) which results in the loss of a phenylalanine residue on the peptide chains of the protein. This error in instruction results in lung infections, pancreatis, male infertility, but never anything beneficial.

What causes cancer? This involves genes concerned with cell replication. There are genes whose function are to suppress cell replication and genes which are concerned with encouraging cell replication. Both are necessary for proper cell function and growth. When a mutation, however, damages the gene for suppression of cell replication, you get uncontrolled replication of cells which results in a tumor. This is what we call cancer. An analogy given to this would be like having your gas peddle stuck to the floor at full throttle and no brakes. This kind of damaging mutation takes place over time and is mainly an old age disease. However, if this mutation is inherited it results in cancer in children.

Evolutionists will cite sickle cell anemia as an example of a beneficial mutation because if a person receives the mutated gene for this from just one parent he will be resistant to malaria. What they do not tell you is that if the person receives this gene from both parents which results in their having sickle cell anemia, it will result in an early death in life. Regardless of the benefit to resistance to malaria, how is dying early in life beneficial? Again, a person only suffers from this genetic disease if it is passed on by both parents. You are never going to have a generation which all have this disease. It is not going to become a permanent change in the species of humans. It is only going to show up in special cases.

In light of these scientific facts, why do evolutionists continue to insist that evolution came about through mutations? Because there is no new source of genetic material to bring about evolution except through something rewriting the script which already exists. Because they come from the assumption that evolution is true, it had to come about through genetic mutations. However, ask any evolutionary scientists to give you examples of good beneficial mutations and all you will receive from them is silence. However there are thousands and thousands of documented examples of mutations that are non-beneficial and destructive. When God created us in the beginning the genetic code needed no improvement. Mutations are what computer viruses are to computers, just that: non-beneficial and destructive to the already perfect programing to begin with. Mutations are used to explain over and over again diseases and birth defects. Hundreds of these can be found in the textbooks, but no books can document any beneficial results from mutations of any kind.

Another fact that evolutionists do not explain about the concept of evolution is that in order to produce a new highly complex organ requires not one genetic mutation, but thousands, but not just thousands of mutations, but mutations that can work in concert together and bring about a beneficial result. Science has never witnessed to any degree an organism developing a new organ through mutations. All mutations are destructive, not constructive. Mutations are nothing more than usually a one letter mistake in the genetic code related. Mutations are mutations, not evolution in any stretch of the imagination. This is because mutations are not new information, but just variations on already existing information and not to the benefit of the organism involved. Mutations rather than being an increase of information are a decrease of information, a corrupting of the information that already exists. Information is lost, not built up. No scientist has ever witnessed a mutation increasing information, only corrupting the information that already exists.

Since Evolutionists put forth the hypothesis of evolution through mutations, many experiments have been conducted on life forms to produce genetic mutations. The most popular life form for these experiments have been fruit flies. What has been the end result? While they have, through exposure to radiation, been able to produce mutated fruit flies, what they have not been able to do is reproduce fruit flies from mutated fruit flies. This is because without exception all mutated fruit flies are sterile and die without ever being able to pass on their mutated genes. The end result of all these experiments has been complete and total failure to give any evidence that life on earth evolved through genetic mutations.^{332/11-12, 338/273-274} What they discovered was that no mutation produced knew organs. They discovered that species can vary within certain limits, but cannot go beyond the boundary of their species.^333/124-125

Many mutational experiments were also done on E. coli bacteria. The results were the same: While they came up with different strains of E. coli bacteria, it remained E. coli bacteria.^349/88 C. H. Waddington, a biologist at the University of Edinburgh, had put it this way:

"A new gene mutation can cause an alteration only to a characteristic which the organism had had in previous generations. It could not produce a lobster's claw on a cat; it could only alter the cat in some way, still leaving it essentially a cat."^440/197

What does this prove? It proves that diversification of life did not come about through mutational evolution. It also proves that diversification of life within a species does not prove evolution; it proves that diversification within a species is possible but not outside the species and that this diversification did not come about through mutations, but was always present within the DNA of the species to start with. The issue is not whether variations can be achieved within a species but whether a species can mutate into a new and completely different species. This has never been proved in any experiment on any level.

According to scientists, the minimum number of mutations necessary to bring about the simplest new structure in an organism is five.^332/67-68 However, these five mutations must be of the right kind and must be functionally related. This means that not just any five mutations will do the job. The odds of five mutations taking place functionally related at the same time in a single organism by chance are astronomically impossible. Scientists believe only one mutation takes place in every 100,000 gene replications.^338/272 The probability of five non-harmful mutations taking place functionally related in a single cell is 1 in 10⁴⁰.^355/5 If one hundred trillion, 10¹⁴, bacteria were produced every second for five billion years, 10¹⁷ seconds, the resulting population would be only 1/1,000,000,000 of what was needed.

This is just the first step. Next, these five mutations must somehow be brought together to be integrated and function in concert with each other. Next, this integrated function must provide some advantage or be scattered within the population due to interbreeding.^333/1/87 With these odds, it is not possible to explain through these means how complex life forms came into being given any amount of time. For example: the wing of the fruit fly alone involves 30-40 genes. This means that given the age of the universe, as evolutionists define it, through random selection you might produce one wing of a fruit fly. That is trillions of years away from a fully formed fruit fly let alone an animal or human. Evolution is not the answer about how we got here. As a result Gertrude Himmelfarb in her book Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution (1959) concluded:

"It is now discovered that favorable mutations are not only small but exceedingly rare, and the fortuitous combination of favorable mutations such as would be required for the production of even a fruit fly, let alone a man, is so much rarer still that the odds against it would be expressed by a number containing as many noughts as there are letters in the average novel, ‘a number greater than that of all the electrons and protons in the visible universe’—an improbability as great as that a monkey provided with a typewriter would by chance peck out the works of Shakespeare."^440/196

What other evidences do we have against biological evolution? No one in the history of man has ever witnessed any life form forming new organs and then passing this on to the next generation. There is no observational evidence of transitions from one life form to another anywhere. All life forms are complete within their own kind.^336/67-68

Then there are cases like the Bombardier Beetle. The Bombardier Beetle has two glands which produce a liquid which is stored in two storage chambers. When this beetle wishes some of the liquid is transferred to two combustion chambers. When this beetle feels threatened he produces an audible explosion which ejects a noxious foul-smelling fluid at the temperature of boiling water. It aims this discharge with remarkable accuracy and quickly. He is able to do this twenty times or more before exhausting his supply which can then be replenished within twenty-four hours.

This liquid in the Bombardier Beetle contains 10% hydroquinones and 23% hydrogen peroxide. When these two liquids are combined in a laboratory there is an immediate explosion. How does this beetle keep from exploding before discharging this liquid? Through an inhibitor present in the liquid. When he is ready to discharge the liquid for protection, he immediately releases an anti-inhibitor as it leaves the body and the explosion occurs warning off its enemies. How complicated is this process. Modern science is not able to duplicate either the inhibitor or the anti-inhibitor.

What is the problem with this scenario? Like so many things in nature, this beetle could not exist as it does unless all these components were in place all at once at the same time. If these different traits had evolved, the beetle would have blown himself up to extinction before random mutations produced the inhibitor. The process of the Bombardier Beetle cannot be explained through mutational evolution or any other kind of evolution.

An evolutionary scientist in a February, 1985 issue of Time magazine brought out the point that humans have acid in their stomachs and that if the stomach did not have a mucus lining that the acid would eat through their stomachs and humans would be extinct. His point being that the Bombardier Beetle was not an argument against evolution. How so? The point is that man’s digestive system also could not exist unless all components had been put in place all at once for the same reason the Bombardier Beetle could not exist as it does. This is not an argument against creation but a further support of what we are saying. When one considers the complexity of living organisms, there is no scientific way to explain how they could possibly have evolved into existence. They had to be created all at once as a total functioning organism.

Another example is the metamorphous of a butterfly. The development of the caterpillar’s hard casing and the dissolution of its organs while in that state could not have been passed on to offspring unless the capacity for metamorphosis was also present.^336/71 A bird’s wing is amazingly complex. His wing, even if it could have evolved by chance would be of no value to the bird if not accompanied with related nerves, muscles and skeleton.^349/98

What do known mutations indicate? First, that the human mutation problem is bad and getting worse. Second, that with this increasing bad results of mutation there is not one good off setting beneficial mutation known in existence. Mutations maim, cripple and sometimes kill. Gene therapy masks the effects of these genetic deffects, but they do not reverse the underlying degenerative process. This slow ongoing mutation rate in the human gnome will eventually turn the human genetic code into meaningless gobbledygook.

What do mutations indicate about the Book of Genesis? Mutations indicate that what Moses recorded in Genesis is true: that in the beginning when God created Adam and Eve using DNA as the basis for maintaining the bodies that He gave them, that the information in DNA was perfect and complete to start with. It also proves that when Adam and Eve sinned and God cursed the ground and man, that man came into bondage to corruption evidenced by documented destructive mutations. It is evidence of that curse because no new beneficial information is being added to our DNA, only destructive results through mutations. They indicate that man’s physical body as well as his soul are corrupted and in the process of corruption needing God’s redemption. This is exactly God’s promise to those who turn to His Son’s death and shed blood on the cross for redemption: in the resurrection of the righteous a new uncorrupted body and a redemption of the ecosystem as well for the new uncorrupted body to thrive in without corruption.

"Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood is not able to inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit the incorruptible. Behold, I tell you a mystery; we shall not all sleep [die], but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruptibility, and this mortal must put on immortality. But when this corruptible will have put on the incorruptible, and this mortal will have put on immortality, then will come about the saying that is written, ‘Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?’ The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law; But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." (1 Corinthians 15:50-57)

"For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that is to be revealed to us. For the anxious longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. (Romans 8:18-23)